<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s new favicon: the end of an era (poll)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/</link>
	<description>Website of Peter Craddock, novel writer and composer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:47:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google: nuova icona favicon.ico &#124; Computer &#124; Fabrizio Castagnotto</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Google: nuova icona favicon.ico &#124; Computer &#124; Fabrizio Castagnotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-330</guid>
		<description>[...] gi&#224; chi in rete parla di &#8220;fine di un&#8217;era&#8220;, chi si aspetta da un momento all&#8217;altro che arrivino altri cambiamenti. O chi, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gi&agrave; chi in rete parla di &#8220;fine di un&#8217;era&#8220;, chi si aspetta da un momento all&#8217;altro che arrivino altri cambiamenti. O chi, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me, or has Google changed its favicon to a blue &#8220;g&#8221;? &#171; Unisyc.</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me, or has Google changed its favicon to a blue &#8220;g&#8221;? &#171; Unisyc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion on this all-important matter can be found here, here and here. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion on this all-important matter can be found here, here and here. I&rsquo;m sure you&rsquo;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Google Favicon (sucks or not?) &#171; worth.Posting</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>New Google Favicon (sucks or not?) &#171; worth.Posting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] and easy to use. They&#8217;re not trying to be what they&#8217;re not. But this favicon is. It&#8217;s the end of an era, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and easy to use. They&rsquo;re not trying to be what they&rsquo;re not. But this favicon is. It&rsquo;s the end of an era, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Craddock</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Update 3:
It seems that &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/one-fish-two-fish-red-fish-blue-fish.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; has published a small explanation of their choice. Interesting read, though it doesn&#8217;t convince me: it seems they are accepting new designs, if you have any ideas!
Thanks Wisdump for the link to that Google reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update 3:<br />
It seems that <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/one-fish-two-fish-red-fish-blue-fish.html" rel="nofollow">Google</a> has published a small explanation of their choice. Interesting read, though it doesn&rsquo;t convince me: it seems they are accepting new designs, if you have any ideas!<br />
Thanks Wisdump for the link to that Google reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is the Google new favicon so ugly? &#124; Wisdump</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is the Google new favicon so ugly? &#124; Wisdump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] to use. They&#8217;re not trying to be what they&#8217;re not. But this favicon is. It&#8217;s the end of an era, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to use. They&#8217;re not trying to be what they&#8217;re not. But this favicon is. It&#8217;s the end of an era, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Craddock</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-52</guid>
		<description>There we go, poll added!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There we go, poll added!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Craddock</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-51</guid>
		<description>There are a couple, but they all require registration to vote. I might make a Wordpress poll for it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple, but they all require registration to vote. I might make a Wordpress poll for it <img src='http://www.arpia.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Well, who&#039;ll be the first to start a poll? :)
So that we can really figure out.

(I hate it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, who&#8217;ll be the first to start a poll? <img src='http://www.arpia.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
So that we can really figure out.</p>
<p>(I hate it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-48</guid>
		<description>The favicon now works in IE7... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The favicon now works in IE7&#8230; <img src='http://www.arpia.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Oy, this is a bad move. Unless Google is planning to change their world-renowned logo to be just &quot;google&quot; without starting with a capital G (no!), they really need to keep the favicon as a capital G, not a lowercase g. It doesn&#039;t look at all like it belongs to the same company as their logo, until eventually you realize &quot;oh, it&#039;s the fourth letter from the logo&quot;. Bad. Regardless of what style the favicon is, the letter G really needs to be capitalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy, this is a bad move. Unless Google is planning to change their world-renowned logo to be just &#8220;google&#8221; without starting with a capital G (no!), they really need to keep the favicon as a capital G, not a lowercase g. It doesn&#8217;t look at all like it belongs to the same company as their logo, until eventually you realize &#8220;oh, it&#8217;s the fourth letter from the logo&#8221;. Bad. Regardless of what style the favicon is, the letter G really needs to be capitalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
