<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arpia.be &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arpia.be/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arpia.be</link>
	<description>Website of Peter Craddock, novel writer and composer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s new favicon, again</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2009/01/googles-new-favicon-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arpia.be/2009/01/googles-new-favicon-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webdesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, here we are, folks: Google have decided to update their favicon, again. 
Last time they did that, back in May &#8217;08, it spurred a whole lot of reactions all over the web, and if you take a look at the poll results in that older post, you&#8217;ll see lots of the reactions were negative.
With [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here we are, folks: <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/googles-new-favicon.html">Google have decided to update their favicon</a>, again.<br />
<a href="http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/">Last time they did that, back in May &#8217;08</a>, it spurred a whole lot of reactions all over the web, and if you take a look at the poll results in that older post, you&#8217;ll see lots of the reactions were negative.</p>
<p>With time, however, I&#8217;m sure everyone got used to it, whether they initially liked it or not.</p>
<p>So, now that the new one has come, I&#8217;m starting to regret the previous one. Despite the fact that it wasn&#8217;t as good as the one before, I still prefer it to this current one.</p>
<p>Out with the old, in with the new&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Google favicon comparison" src="http://www.arpia.be/images/wp/googlecomp.jpg" alt="" width="80" height="30" /></p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arpia.be/2009/01/googles-new-favicon-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s new favicon: the end of an era (poll)</title>
		<link>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Craddock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webdesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpia.be/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are times when a company decides to change its logo. And there are times when it decides to change its favicon. 
Either way, it has a huge effect on the consumer, because he/she has to adapt to the change.
Ambrosia Software did this recently, to illustrate, and it showed that &#8220;ASW&#8221; was letting go of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are times when a company decides to change its logo. And there are times when it decides to change its favicon.<br />
Either way, it has a huge effect on the consumer, because he/she has to adapt to the change.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ambrosiasw.com/news/">Ambrosia Software</a> did this recently, to illustrate, and it showed that &#8220;ASW&#8221; was letting go of its &#8220;sketched&#8221; look to go towards a new &#8220;modern&#8221; look.</p>
<p>And now, Google is doing the same thing.<br />
<span id="more-35"></span><br />
I noticed it this Friday at noon.<br />
This:<br />
<img src="http://www.arpia.be/public/gogl.jpg" alt="New Google favicon" /><br />
And it has a special gradient on it, too:<br />
<img src="http://www.arpia.be/public/gogl2.jpg" alt="New Google favicon gradient" /></p>
<p>So, good or bad?</p>
<p>In my oh-so-humble opinion, it was probably time they changed it. Google has had that favicon for years now, and it did start to look &#8220;strange&#8221; among all those fancy new designs sprouting up all over the web. And in the new Firefox 3 (not yet officially released, still in &#8220;Release Candidate&#8221; testing stage):<br />
<img src="http://www.arpia.be/public/oldgogl.jpg" alt="Old Google favicon" /></p>
<p>But it marks the end of an era.<br />
The old &#8220;G&#8221; was recognisable a mile away. It was a capital letter referring to a company that was becoming capital.<br />
Now, Google is by far the &#8220;web search&#8221; industry leader for consumers in their everyday web experience, and it probably doesn&#8217;t need to make itself known much more.</p>
<p>But why a lower-case &#8220;g&#8221;?<br />
I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait to hear from Google to find out.</p>
<p>While I like the simplicity of the favicon design, it doesn&#8217;t stand out anymore.<br />
Plus, as you can see in the second screenshot (Safari) and the one below (Firefox 3), it doesn&#8217;t stand out at all when you hover over it on Mac browsers (no idea how it looks on a PC):<br />
<img src="http://www.arpia.be/public/gogl3.jpg" alt="New Google favicon gradient" /></p>
<p>Perhaps they could have done away with that &#8220;fancy&#8221; gradient, and made the outline more defined.<br />
Then again, it is much less bulky than the old one had become.</p>
<p><em> </em><br />
Will this lead Google to redesign its oh-so-convenient website?</p>
<p><em> </em><br />
Small update: it&#8217;s all over the web now. It seems most people prefer the old favicon, but many of the opinions voiced here and there tend to show that people either hate it or like it a lot. Funny how when Google sneezes, the internet shivers.</p>
<p>Update 2: poll added:</p>
<p>[poll id="2"]</p>
<p>Update 3: it seems that <a title="Google reaction" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/one-fish-two-fish-red-fish-blue-fish.html">Google</a> has published a small explanation of their choice. Interesting read, though it doesn&#8217;t convince me: it seems they are accepting new designs, if you have any ideas!</p>
<p>Update 4, 11th of January 2009: well, <a href="http://www.arpia.be/2009/01/googles-new-favicon-again/">they&#8217;ve re-designed it again</a>.</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arpia.be/2008/05/googles-new-favicon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

