Comments on: The cutest legal provision

By: JacaByte

JacaByte — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:53:49 +0000

My apologies as well; I thought you were Francois and didn’t realize you were supporting my argument… :/

By: Pip

Pip — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:10:46 +0000

Sorry for the harsh response, Jaca, my bad.

By: François

François — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:35:58 +0000

That would probably infringe freedom of speech. Balancing rights…
I can’t help but agree with JacaByte #8 anyway.

By: Peter Craddock

Peter Craddock — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:43:47 +0000

It’s not insulting, Philip: it’s because you started with human rights and then with the way people don’t care about Haiti

By: Pip

Pip — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:37:15 +0000

Jaca, I wasn’t referring to the earthquake. I was referring to this: “[...] a fee for every use of the “Haiti” word.”
And you don’t have to be insulting, either.

By: JacaByte

JacaByte — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:24:15 +0000

It wouldn’t be against human rights because no human rights are being violated; an earthquake is not a legal entity. Nice non sequitur.

By: Pip

Pip — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:02:30 +0000

Wouldn’t it even be against Human Rights?
And anyways, if it weren’t for the disaster, people wouldn’t care for Haiti, which is itself a sad truth.

By: JacaByte

JacaByte — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:42:19 +0000

That’s different; Haiti isn’t cute.

By: François

François — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:33:21 +0000

So I propose helping Haiti by asking a fee for every use of the “Haiti” word. Would you agree ?

By: JacaByte

JacaByte — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:16:50 +0000

I find it amusing that anybody could be against legislation which will benefit a children’s hospital, all in the name of a play.